What is the meaning of rational basis?

Legal Definition of rational basis : a reason or ground (as for legislation or an action by a government agency) that is not unreasonable or arbitrary and that bears a rational relationship to a legitimate state interest — see also rational basis test.

How do you do a rational basis review?

To pass the rational basis test, the statute or ordinance must have a legitimate state interest, and there must be a rational connection between the statute’s/ordinance’s means and goals.

What is the rational basis test how is it used?

The rational basis test is the easiest test for the government. The plaintiff will need to prove that the law is not rationally related to a legitimate government interest. Otherwise, the law is Constitutional. If a court applies the rational basis test, the government is likely to win the case.

What is the rational basis standard when it comes to non protected classes?

Under the rational basis test, the person challenging the law (not the government) must prove either: The government has no legitimate interest in the law or policy; or. There is no reasonable, rational link between that interest and the challenged law.

How do the rational basis and the intermediate standard?

How do the rational basis and the intermediate standard of review differ? Rational basis review refers to the lowest three levels of scrutiny applied by all courts. Intermediate standard of review is a higher level of scrutiny.

What is rational scrutiny?

Rational basis scrutiny means a level of scrutiny applied by courts while determining cases involving issues of constitutional due process or equal protection issues pertaining to the Fifth Amendment or Fourteenth Amendment .

What is rational basis?

rational basis. n. a test of constitutionality of a statute, asking whether the law has a reasonable connection to achieving a legitimate and constitutional objective.

What is rational basis analysis?

rational basis test – Legal Definition. n. A principle of analysis under the due process or the equal protection clause, which may be used to either uphold or void a law based upon the law’s serving to reasonably attain some legitimate governmental objective.