What did Maurice Merleau Ponty do for a living?

Maurice Merleau-Ponty. For most of his career, Merleau-Ponty focused on the problems of perception and embodiment as a starting point for clarifying the relation between the mind and the body, the objective world and the experienced world, expression in language and art, history, politics, and nature.

What did Maurice Merleau Ponty mean by phenomenology of perception?

Phenomenology of Perception. In this conception of time as field of presence, which “reveals the subject and the object as two abstract moments of a unique structure, namely, presence ” (PP: 494/454–55), Merleau-Ponty sees the resolution to all problems of transcendence as well as the foundation for human freedom.

Where was Jean Merleau Ponty born and raised?

1. Life and Works. Merleau-Ponty was born in Rochefort-sur-Mer, in the province of Charente-Maritime, on March 14, 1908. After the death in 1913 of his father, a colonial artillery captain and a knight of the Legion of Honor, he moved with his family to Paris.

When did Maurice Merleau-Ponty marry Suzanne Jolibois?

In November 1940, he married Suzanne Jolibois, and their daughter Marianne was born in June 1941. In the winter of 1940–41, Merleau-Ponty renewed his acquaintance with Jean-Paul Sartre, whom he had met as a student at the École Normale, through their involvement in the resistance group Socialisme et Liberté.

What did Maurice Merleau-Ponty mean by primacy of perception?

His work is often associated with the idea of the ‘primacy of perception’, though rather than rejecting scientific and analytic ways of knowing the world, Merleau-Ponty simply wanted to argue that such knowledge is always derivative in relation to the more practical exigencies of the body’s exposure to the world. 2. Early Philosophy

What did Maurice Merleau-Ponty say about Descartes?

Descartes’ prioritizing of the mental above the physical (and indeed the duality itself), is very obvious here and this is something that Merleau-Ponty strongly rejects. As well as being unjust to existential experience, it also leaves the problem of meaningful judgment untouched.