Contributing

What cases were Mehta Vs Union of India deal with?

What cases were Mehta Vs Union of India deal with?

complex at Delhi. This gas leak occurred soon after the infamous Bhopal gas leak and created a lot of panic in Delhi. One person died in the incident and few were hospitalized….

M. C. Mehta v. Union of India
Court Supreme Court of India
Full case name M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (UOI) and Ors.
Decided 20 December 1986

What does Mehta Vs Union of India popularly known as?

Mehta vs. Union of India, (Popularly known as “Oleum Gas Leak Case”) – Under Article 21 of the Constitution, the Supreme Court recognized as part of the fundamental right to life the right to live in a pollution-free environment.

What is Oleum gas leak case?

Oleum gas from Shriram Foods and Fertilizers which was a fertilizer plant leaked causing harm to numerous people. The Ryland v. Fletcher rule was applied in this case.

Who is Shri MC Mehta?

Mahesh Chandra Mehta is a public interest attorney from India. He single-handedly won numerous landmark judgments from India’s Supreme Court since 1984, including introducing lead-free gasoline to India and reducing the industrial pollution fouling the Ganga and eroding the Taj Mahal.

Which principle was evolved by the Indian courts in the case of MC Mehta Vs Union of India briefly explain the principle?

The Supreme Court, in the M.C. Mehta vs Union of India 1987, found strict liability principle inadequate to protect citizens’ rights and replaced it with the absolute liability principle. This judgement came on the Oleum gas leak case of Delhi in 1986.

When did Delhi oleum gas occurred?

While the petition was pending, on 4 and 6 December 1985, there was leakage of oleum gas from one of its units which caused the death of an advocate and affected the health of several others. The incident took place on December 4, 1985.

What is oleum write its formula?

Oleum is identified by the CAS number 8014-95-7 (EC/List number: 616-954-1 ; ECHA InfoCard: 100.116. 872). For x = 1 and y = 2 the empirical formula H2S2O7 for disulfuric (pyrosulfuric) acid is obtained.

What is strict and absolute liability?

A person is made liable only when he is at fault. In the case of strict liability, there are some exceptions where the defendant wouldn’t be made liable. But in the case of absolute liability, no exceptions are provided to the defendant. The defendant will be made liable under the strict liability rule no matter what.

Why MC Mehta is famous for?

M.C. Mehta single-handedly won numerous landmark judgments from India’s Supreme Court since 1984, including introducing lead-free gasoline to India and reducing the industrial pollution fouling the Ganges and eroding the Taj Mahal. This spurred Mehta to file his first environmental case in the Supreme Court of India.

Who does the EPA regulate?

The Environmental Protection Agency is a United States federal government agency whose mission is to protect human and environmental health. The EPA regulates the manufacturing, processing, distribution, and use of chemicals and other pollutants.

What is precautionary principle and polluter pays principle?

Hence, principles such as ‘precautionary principle’ and ‘polluter pays principle’ are constitutional mandates to curb the degradation of the environment. Such incidents in the past further necessitate mandating principles for combatting the effects of pollution.

Who was the respondent in m.c.mehta v.union of India?

M.C. Mehta v. Union of India [Mehta II] Equivalent citations: 1988 AIR 1115, 1988 SCR (2) 530 Petitioner: M.C. Mehta Respondent: Union Of India & Ors Date of Judgement: 12/01/1988 Bench: Venkataramiah, E.S. (J) Ganga is a trans-boundary river of Asia flowing through India and Bangladesh.

What was the nature of the writ petition filed by M C Mehta?

In 1985, M.C. Mehta filed a writ petition in the nature of mandamus to prevent these leather tanneries from disposing off domestic and industrial waste and effluents in the Ganga river. This writ petition was bifurcated by the Supreme Court into two parts known as Mehta I and Mehta II. Mehta I [M.C. Mehta v.

When was PIL filed by m.c.mehta?

A PIL was filed by M.C Mehta who is a well known PIL attorney in India, he filed this case in 1986 which enlarged the scope and ambit of Article 21 and 31 to include the right to healthy and pollution-free environment in it.

What was the outcome of Shriram Industries vs Union of India?

The quantum of compensation was determinable by the District Judge , Delhi .It also shows that the court made the industry “absolutely liable ” and compensation to be paid as when the injury was proved without requiring the industry to be present in the case .